Bokma v. Raglin
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 960
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by ordering appellant to sign authorization forms for both physical and mental health records, as both were causally and historically related to her lawsuit. The trial court also did not err by not ordering an in-camera review of such records, because there is nothing in the record before us that demonstrates appellant requested such a review. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court reviews factual findings de novo in appeal pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, 28 without affording evidentiary weight to factual findings contained within board's decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.