Skip to main content
· 5/2/2006

Boivin, Charles v. US Airways, Inc.

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 148
  • 371 U.S. App. D.C. 9
  • 37 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1934
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10875
  • 2006 WL 1147746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts \owe substantial deference\ to the Corporation's \interpretation of its own regulations\
  • noting that courts “owe substantial deference” to the Corporation’s “interpretation of its own regulations”
  • “The pilots concede that the PBGC’s interpretations of the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions are entitled to judicial deference, and that we must uphold them if they are reasonable.”
  • discussing the futility exception to administrative exhaustion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Garland, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.