· 5/2/2006
Boivin, Charles v. US Airways, Inc.
Citations
- 446 F.3d 148
- 371 U.S. App. D.C. 9
- 37 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1934
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10875
- 2006 WL 1147746
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that courts \owe substantial deference\ to the Corporation's \interpretation of its own regulations\
- noting that courts “owe substantial deference” to the Corporation’s “interpretation of its own regulations”
- “The pilots concede that the PBGC’s interpretations of the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions are entitled to judicial deference, and that we must uphold them if they are reasonable.”
- discussing the futility exception to administrative exhaustion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Garland, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.