Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Board of Forestry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to Alden and, notwithstanding the text of the Eleventh Amendment, considering the defendant’s immunity claim
• relying on First English in holding that “at least some constitutional claims are actionable against a state, even without a waiver or congressional abrogation of sovereign immunity, due to the nature of the constitutional provision involved”
• referring to Alden and considering the defendant’s immunity claims under the Eleventh Amendment
• “[T]he [Supreme] Court, in its recent Eleventh Amendment decisions, did not intend to abandon the notion that at least some constitutional claims are actionable against a state ... due to the nature of the constitutional provision involved.”
• requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before takings claim is ripe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).