Skip to main content
· 3/15/2000

Boicourt v. Amex Assurance Co.

Citations

  • 93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 763
  • 78 Cal. App. 4th 1390
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2785
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2051
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an insurer can violate good faith duty without a settlement demand by the claimant, such as where insurer has a policy of never disclosing policy limits to injured parties
  • noting that Merritt’s choice of language suggesting a per se rule was both “gratuitous[ ]” in the context of that case and “improvident”
  • noting that Merritt’s choice of language suggesting a per se rule was both “gratuitous[ ]” in the context of that case and “improvident”
  • “[A] formal settle- ment offer is not an absolute prerequisite to a bad faith action . . . .”
  • “[A] formal settlement offer is not an absolute prerequisite to a bad faith action....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.