Bohri v. Barnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “estate planning-related communications” between a law firm and client are “unquestionably privileged,” i.e. “made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice”
• the attorney-client privilege is inapplicable to “business-orientated communications” that “obviously were not intended to be kept confidential . . . [and] virtually by definition . . . were meant to be conveyed to third parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).