Bohonus v. Amerco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a general rule, it is essential to the existence of an estoppel that the representation be relied upon and that such reliance be justifiable. Reliance is not justified where knowledge to the contrary exists.”
• Arizona Supreme Court decided, under provisions of the U.P.L. consonant with those of New Jersey, a partner's interest in the partnership may be charged by a creditor and sold but specific partnership property may not be sold to satisfy the individual partner's debts
• “Reliance is not justified where knowledge to the contrary exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).