Skip to main content
· 8/10/1995

Bohme v. Pemco Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 899 P.2d 787
  • 127 Wash. 2d 409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A UIM exclusion must be struck if it conflicts with state statute or public policy.
  • “ ‘UIM coverage is a second layer of coverage for the injured party’. In Tissell, a majority of the court was critical of an opinion that translated the purpose of UIM coverage from assuring a dual layer of recovery into ensuring full compensation for accident victims.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.