· 8/10/1995
Bohme v. Pemco Mutual Insurance
Citations
- 899 P.2d 787
- 127 Wash. 2d 409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- A UIM exclusion must be struck if it conflicts with state statute or public policy.
- “ ‘UIM coverage is a second layer of coverage for the injured party’. In Tissell, a majority of the court was critical of an opinion that translated the purpose of UIM coverage from assuring a dual layer of recovery into ensuring full compensation for accident victims.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.