Boham v. City of Sioux City, Iowa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding expert testimony about crossing guard training was sufficient— not that it was required — to support a failure-to-train specification of negligence
• concluding expert testimony about crossing guard training was sufficient—not that it was required—to support a failure-to-train specification of negligence
• holding the defendant’s objection to the damage instructions, that “[w]e don’t think there’s sufficient evidence in the record to engender jury questions on these points,” did not adequately identify the specific evidentia-ry deficiency, and therefore error was not preserved
• “A party may not amplify or change an objection on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).