Bogle v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that 14 “[a] party to a contract cannot take advantage of his own act or omission to escape 15 liability thereon”
• holding that parties were bound by a settlement and compromise, even though certain details as to avoidance of tax liability were not worked out, where such details were not essential to the proposal and did not change terms or purpose to be accomplished by the settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).