Boggs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence insufficient to show direct contempt and no basis for indirect contempt because of failure to meet procedural requirements therefor
• holding evidence insufficient to show direct contempt and no basis for indirect contempt because of failure to meet procedural requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Neiswinger
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-30· cited 14×
• Pryor v. Bostwick
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-16· cited 10×
• Broderick v. Denbo
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-12-18· cited 6×
• Rice v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-09-20· cited 5×
• Skolnick v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-25· cited 4×
• Aguilar v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1981-02-25· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Oliver
  Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
• Cooke v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
• Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
• LaGRANGE ETC. v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1958-12-09· cited 52×
• Allison v. State Ex Rel. Allison
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-02-05· cited 23×
• Brennan v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1961-04-04· cited 18×
• Kerr v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1923-10-30· cited 18×
• McIntire v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1967-02-10· cited 15×
• Jacobsen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-01-15· cited 10×
• Garlin v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-04-10· cited 7×
• In the Matter of May
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1976-12-09· cited 7×