Boggs v. Peake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims based on separate and distinctly diagnosed conditions must be considered separate and distinct claims for purposes of VA benefits
• holding that claims based on separate and distinctly diagnosed conditions must be considered separate and distinct claims for purposes of VA benefits
• holding that claims based on separate and distinct diagnoses be treated as separate claims even if the symptomatology was over- lapping
• holding that a claim based upon a distinctly diagnosed disease or injury has a different factual basis, and as such, cannot be considered the same as a previously decided claim that was based upon another diagnosis or injury
• \[A] veteran cannot be compensated more than once 13 for the same disability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).