Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, LLP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that reasonable jury could find remark that it was a “ ‘chocolate night’ at Le Bar Bat and refer[ring] to the three [plaintiffs] as dark, light, and semisweet chocolate” created a racially hostile environment
• concluding that reasonable jury could find remark that it was a “ ‘chocolate night’ at Le Bar Bat and refer[ring] to the three [plaintiffs] as dark, light, and semisweet chocolate” created a racially hostile environment
• concluding that reasonable jury could find remark that it was a “ ‘chocolate night’ at Le Bar Bat and refer[ring] to the three [plaintiffs] as dark, light, and semisweet chocolate” created a racially hostile environment
• concluding that reasonable jury could find remark that it was a “ ‘chocolate night’ at Le Bar Bat and refer[ring] to the three [plaintiffs] as dark, light, and semisweet chocolate” created a racially hostile environment
• finding that a reasonable jury could find that chocolate remarks create a racially hostile work environment even if made in a joking manner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).