Boggess v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding counsel’s damages 19 estimate insufficient to demonstrate amount in controversy given it “provided[d] no details 20 concerning the damages calculation”
• finding demand “facially insufficient” in light of disavowal and defendant’s 15 failure to adduce further evidence that it was reasonable or accurate
• rejecting defendant’s second removal as “nothing more than an impermissible attempt to offer additional evidence to prove what should have been proved in the first notice of removal”
• rejecting defendant’s second removal as “nothing more than an impermissible attempt to ‘offer additional evidence to prove what should have been proved in the first notice of removal—its citizenship’” (cleaned up) (citations omitted)
• “[A] corporate JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 21-3585 PA (GJSx
• “Successive removals are 27 therefore improper absent a showing that the posture of the case has so changed that it is 28 substantially a new case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).