Bogard v. Inter-State Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings because plaintiffs unjust enrichment claim was precluded by existence of legally valid contract
• affirming grant of motion for judgment on the pleadings because plaintiff’s unjust enrichment claim was precluded by the existence of a legally valid contract
• affirming trial court's grant of defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings because plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim was precluded by the existence of a legally valid contract
• “Under Georgia law, an insurance contract is considered ambiguous only if its terms are susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.”
• “Under Georgia law, an insurance contract is considered ambiguous only if its terms are susceptible to two or more reasonable interpretations.”
• “the existence of the contract between the parties precludes [plaintiff|s unjust enrichment claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).