Bogard v. Illinois Central Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “even the dissent in Her Majesty [which argued against supplanting the federal permitting program under the CAA by nonprofits and governments] recognized that a cause of action for pollution might be available to private litigants.”
• disagreeing with TVA and following Bell II and MTBE Products Liability Litigation
• disagreeing with TVA and following Bell II and MTBE Products Liability Litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).