Skip to main content
· 10/19/1911

Bogard v. Hindman

Citations

  • 145 Ky. 11
  • 139 S.W. 1058
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding system in question was an ATDS where the only human intervention identified prior to sending the text was the \collection of numbers for [the system's] database of numbers\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.