Bogard v. CANNON & WENDT ELEC. CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that questions that could have been raised on the first appeal cannot be presented or considered on a later appeal
• appellant’s failure to challenge a ruling in his first appeal meant that the ruling was affirmed by implication and could not be challenged in second appeal
• appeals from judgment may not be taken piecemeal; issues that could have been raised on first appeal, but were not, cannot be presented on a later appeal
• discussing judicial policy of not reopening previously decided questions
• trial court must strictly follow appellate mandate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).