Boese v. Randolph-Wells Building Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding representation at a suppression hearing by lawyer disbarred on final day of hearing not per se ineffective
• finding that disciplinary proceedings running parallel to the defense attorney’s representation of the defendant did not create a conflict, and, in fact, “provided an incentive for the vigorous efforts [defense counsel] appears to have expended.”
• attorney had no reason to fear that vigorous defense would expose him to unrelated charges of misappropriation of client funds
• “[W]e have never purported to expand applicability of the rule beyond the sort of egregious conduct present in Solina and Cancilla.”
• “[W]e have never purported to expand applicability of the rule beyond the sort of egregious conduct present in Solina and Cancilla.”
• representation by counsel who had been disbarred but did not know it and resigned as counsel upon receiving notice, not per se ineffective representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).