Boerum Johnson, LLC v. Marte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing right of employees to refrain from concerted union activities by being able to resign union membership without interference.
• striking down fines imposed on employees who tendered resignations which were ineffective under a union constitution
• involving a union shop agreement and the National Labor Relations Act § 8(a)(3): “Full union membership thus no longer can be a requirement of employment.... By allowing employees to resign from a union at any time, § 8(a)(3
• stating that “[u]nder Section 8(b)(1)(A
• \[A]n employee required by a union security agreement to assume financial 'membership' ... [is] a 'member' of the union only in the most limited sense\
• the proper question for a reviewing court is whether the Board's construction of the NLRA is reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).