Boelman v. Manson State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Iowa court has previously looked to federal cases interpreting Title VII for guidance in applying chapter 601A (now 216)
• recognizing that Iowa court has previously looked to federal cases interpreting Title VII for guidance in applying chapter 601A (now 216)
• following analysis used for claims under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act in considering disability discrimination claim under chapter 216
• burden-shifting framework not necessary where employer admits adverse employment decision was based on plaintiff’s disability
• looking to federal Title VII cases for analytical framework for employment discrimination cases under Iowa Code § 216, formerly 601A
• burden-shifting framework is unnecessary where defendant admits reason for adverse employment decision was related to plaintiffs disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).