Boeke v. International Paint Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instruction should only be given where lost future earnings are part of damages and plaintiff had “extremely high” income
• trial court’s failure to instruct on a theory was not prejudicial where the jury’s verdict clearly indicated that the evidence did not establish a necessary element of the theory
• \We agree that the rule of strict exclusion represents the better view\
• \We agree that the rule of strict exclusion represents the better view.\
• “We agree that the rule of strict exclusion represents the better view”
• \We agree that the rule of strict exclusion represents the better view.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).