Boeing Company v. Sierracin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “trade secrets frequently contain elements that by themselves may be in the public domain but together qualify as trade secrets”
• holding that “trade secrets frequently contain elements that by themselves may be in the public domain but together qualify as trade secrets”
• holding that “trade secrets frequently contain elements that by themselves may be in the public domain but together qualify as trade secrets”
• holding that “trade secrets frequently contain elements that by themselves may be in the public domain but together qualify as trade secrets”
• holding that “trade secrets frequently contain elements that by themselves may be in the public domain but together qualify as trade secrets”
• holding that a court was not required to make an explicit finding of irreparable harm to enter a permanent injunction after a jury determined the defendant was stealing trade secrets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).