Boeing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Cascade Corporation, Opinion-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a district court’s allocation based on the “quantity of toxic chemicals each company put into the ground,” even though the effect of each instance of dumping may have been different
• affirming district court's decision to allocate a cleanup site's future costs and past costs in the same way because sufficient facts existed for determining each company's responsibility for the contamination, even if future costs were unknown
• contribution claims among existing parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).