Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the Court is not satisfied that [defendant] has presented sufficient evidence that [alleged contemporaneous inventors] cultured the PRRS virus or that they chose MA-104 cells for any particular reason other than that they were available at the time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).