Skip to main content
· 5/17/1994

Bodiford v. State of Ala.

Citations

  • 854 F. Supp. 886
  • 3 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1071
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12485
  • 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1335
  • 1994 WL 237038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no property interest in Alabama state employee’s “right to be classified according to his abilities”
  • although a portion of alleged unlawful conduct occurred prior to effective date, ADA claim survives because \discriminatory conduct is continuing in nature\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Ment

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.