Skip to main content
· 6/19/1950

Bodenweiser v. Banfield

Citations

  • 341 Ill. App. 418
  • 94 N.E.2d 104
  • 1950 Ill. App. LEXIS 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “district court has jurisdiction to determine whether, during the [filing period], Sunbeam was guilty of any conduct which gave rise to a Title VII claim by Moore”
  • failure to promote may be continuing offense, but at least one of the incidents must be subject of timely complaint
  • “[S]ince discharge was not encompassed within the charge filed with the EEOC, it may not form the basis for a complaint in the federal district court.”
  • as part of compromise to ensure passage of Civil Rights Act of 1964, sponsors consented to short limitations period for private claims as prerequisite to permitting claim to be filed in federal court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuohy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.