Skip to main content
· 1/29/1973

Bodcaw Company v. Enterkin

Citations

  • 273 So. 2d 325
  • 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the granting of an exception of no cause of action where the only disturbance in law alleged in a possessory action was the filing of a lawsuit wherein the defendant in the possessory action claimed ownership of the property at issue
  • reconventional demand asserting that trespass suit disturbed party’s possession failed to state cause of action because claim of trespass was asserted adversely in an action against alleged possessor and therefore was not a disturbance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fruge, Hood and Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.