· 11/12/1928
Bockus v. Yuen
Citations
- 29 F.2d 205
- 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the “burden of proof issue was preserved for our review” when “the Board determined that [the petitioner] had not preserved the burden of proof issue but, neverthe- less, proceeded to address the merits of that issue”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.