Bockman-Fryberger v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs “small business set-aside and bundling allegations are untimely, and should have been raised before proposals were submitted”
• holding that “[a]gencies are entitled to considerable discretion and deference in matters requiring exercise of technical judgment”
• holding protestor waived objections to the terms of the solicitation by not filing protest during the time for submitting bids
• observing that a “protestor bears the ‘heavy burden’ of proving the lack of a rational basis or a violation of law by a preponderance of the evidence” in either case
• finding that the protest “should have been raised before proposals were submitted”
• finding that the protest “should have been raised before proposals were submitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).