Bockelmann v. Marynick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A tenant who remains in possession of the premises after termination of the lease occupies ‘wrongfully’ and is said to have a tenancy at sufferance.”
• presumption that one cotenant’s holding over binds another cotenant is contrary to general principles of Texas law
• lease for definite term, with a beginning and ending date, does not require termination notice because tenancy for definite term simply expires at end of the lease term
• lease for definite term, with a beginning and ending date, does not require termination notice because tenancy for definite term simply expires at end of the lease term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).