Bock v. International Nav. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even a . . . highly educated [expert] cannot be expected to draw a mental line in the sand between information gleaned” as a consultant and as a testifying expert
• “. . .the scope of the privilege must be narrowly construed against the expert's proponent . . . and a court should order disclosure when there is at least an ambiguity as to whether the materials informed the expert's opinion, . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).