Boca View Condominium Association, Inc. v. Eleanor Lepselter and Esward Lepselter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that university’s elimination of men’s soccer and men’s wrestling teams “is not a violation of Title IX as long as men’s participation in athletics continues to be ‘substantially proportionate’ to their enrollment”
• finding that an approach that ties interest to opportunity is “fundamentally inconsistent with the purpose of Title IX”
• stating that it would be “imprudent to argue” that Title IX 5 bars “gender-conscious remedies”
• finding that an approach that ties interest to opportunity is \fundamentally inconsistent with the purpose of Title IX\
• stating that it would 27 be “imprudent to argue” that Title IX bars “gender-conscious remedies”
• emphasizing that the appellees’ recommended interest-based test for Title IX compliance “would hinder, and quite possibly reverse, the steady increases in women’s participation and interest in sports that have followed Title IX’s enactment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).