Boca Petroco, Inc. v. Petroleum Realty II, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court impermissibly considered the merits of the action when faced with a motion to cancel notice of lis pendens
• recognizing that Florida court could exercise personal jurisdiction over the parties to action before it, “to indirectly affect title” to property in Georgia “for instance, by requiring the parties to take certain action regarding the property”
• “[t]he doctrine imputed to all third parties [gives] constructive notice of the litigation and of the claims against property being asserted in the pleadings and [binds] third parties to the outcome”
• “[B]ecause a motion to cancel a notice of lis pendens does not raise any issue concerning the merits of a claim, a court may not cancel a lis pendens notice on the ground that the underlying case . . . lacks merit.” (emphasis supplied) (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).