BOBBY STANFILL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an instruction that “exacted a higher standard of proof’ than the law required could not have prejudiced the defendant
• concluding that an instruction that “exacted a higher standard of proof” than the law required could not have prejudiced the defendant
• noting instruction to jury that if it found “that the Government has sustained [its] burden ... beyond a reasonable doubt ... then you must find the defendant guilty”
• noting instruction to jury that if it found \that the Government has sustained [its] burden ... beyond a reasonable doubt ... then you must find the defendant guilty\
• declaring that where the pre-trial destruction of an FBI agent’s notes, which were transferred to other documents that were made available to the defense, was done in good faith as part of a normal practice, their destruction would not be impermissible nor deprive a defendant of any right
• declaring that where the pre-trial destruction of an FBI agent's notes, which were transferred to other documents that were made available to the defense, was done in good faith as part of a normal practice, their destruction would not be impermissible nor deprive a defendant of any right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).