Skip to main content
· 3/1/2000

Bobby E. Welch and Kathleen Newman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 204 F.3d 1228
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1620
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2257
  • 85 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1064
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2961
  • 2000 WL 228327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the taxpayer must establish that income resulted from a nontaxable loan and setting forth factors for determining whether a transaction is a loan
  • noting that a purported lender’s failure to seek repayment is inconsistent with the existence of a bona fide loan
  • stating that factors relevant in assessing whether a transaction is a true loan are: “(1) whether the promise to repay is evidenced by a note or other instrument; (2) whether interest was charged; (3) whether a fixed schedule for repayments was established; (4
  • examining factors necessary to determine whether a transaction constitutes a bona fide loan
  • examining factors necessary to determine whether a transaction constitutes a bona fide loan
  • deposits are prima facie evidence of income, and it is taxpayer’s burden to prove they are not taxable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magill, Hawkins, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.