Bobbitt v. Milberg, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “general objections that the information sought [is] irrelevant, immaterial, oppressive, conclusory or already in possession of the requesting party [are] insufficient.”
• objections to discovery requests must be specific, and general objections that the information sought is irrelevant, immaterial, oppressive, conclusory or already in possession of the requesting party are insufficient
• objections to discovery requests must be specific, and general objections that the information sought is irrelevant, immaterial, oppressive, conclusory or already in possession of the requesting party are insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).