Skip to main content
· 4/8/1994

Bobbitt v. Allied-Signal, Inc.

Citations

  • 639 A.2d 142
  • 334 Md. 347
  • 1994 Md. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objection is not futile in absence of evidence in the record of impatience or oppressive conduct on the part of the trial judge
  • holding that objection is not futile in absence of evidence in the record of impatience or oppressive conduct on the part of the trial judge
  • testimony established that “even if the arthritis effected the development of the shoulder condition, the condition was due in part to the characteristics of [Bobbitt’s] employment” and there was evidence that the syndrome was a “direct consequence of the requirements of [her] occupation”
  • testimony established that “even if the arthritis effected the development of the shoulder condition, the condition was due in part to the characteristics of [Bobbitt’s] employment” and there was evidence that the syndrome was a “direct consequence of the requirements of [her] occupation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Karwacki, Bell, Raker, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.