Boaz v. K-Mart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming decisions of ALJ and Board concluding employer was liable for medical treatment after authorized physician discharged employee as a patient and authorized a return to work
• res judicata effect of worker’s compensation claim does not operate as bar to matters occurring subsequent to hearing on the issues
• “[I]f the employer does not adequately meet the duty of providing treatment the employee may make other arrangements and once treatment by a physician is undertaken an employer may not change positions and cut off the right to continue such treatment.”
• “[I]f the employer does not adequately meet the duty of providing treatment the employee may make other arrangements and once treatment by a physician is undertaken an employer may not change positions and cut off the right to such treatment”
• “[I]f the employer does not adequately meet the duty of providing treatment the employee may make other arrangements and once treatment by a physician is undertaken an employer may not change positions and cut off the right to continue such treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).