Boardman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counterclaim seeking damages for bad-faith denial of insurance coverage precludes Rule 54(b) appeal of duty-to-defend ruling
• “[W]hen the questions remaining in the district court factually overlap those on appeal, presenting a specter of sequential appellate resolution, the appeal is impermissible.”
• “We accordingly vacate the Rule 54(b) judgment and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction”
• 'The possibility that developments in the litigation may moot a claim suggests that appellate resolution be deferred.'
• 'The possibility that developments in the litigation may moot a claim suggests that appellate resolution be deferred.'
• “Rule 54(b) departs from the norm of one appeal per case, a norm that prevents duplicative and time-consuming appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).