Boardman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence that does not exceed the statutory maximum applicable to the crime does not violate Apprendi and a defendant is not entitled to the benefit of Blakely when his sentence became final before Blakely was issued
• holding defendant was not enti-tied to benefit of Blakely because his sentences became final before it was issued
• stating that, if Blakely applied retroactively to cases on collateral review, it could apply to a defendant who was sentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines
• “No matter how one measures the finality of his sentences, they were final before Blakely issued. Accordingly, he is not entitled to [postconviction] relief under Blakely.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).