Boardman v. Board of Supervisors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hether the facts and evidence relied upon to rebut the presumption of payment are true is a question of fact for the jury; but whether, if true, they are sufficient to rebut the presumption, is a question of law for the court.”
• “The presumption of payment may be rebutted … by clear, satisfactory and convincing evidence … that the debt has not been paid, or by proof of circumstances tending to negat[e] the likelihood of payment and sufficiently accounting for the delay of the creditor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).