Boardman Petro. v. Tropic Tint of Jupiter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, in Quanstrom, the supreme court severely restricted the use of multipliers in public policy enforcement cases
• noting that an attorneys fees award was sufficiently in the \public interest\ under section 376.313(6), even though the private plaintiff unquestionably received a personal benefit from the lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).