· 11/19/1975
Board of Zoning App. of City of Whiting v. McFadden
Citations
- 337 N.E.2d 576
- 166 Ind. App. 534
- 1975 Ind. App. LEXIS 1386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no unnecessary hardship where appellant “presented no evidence that the property could not continue to be used profitably as a two-family dwelling as permitted by the zoning ordinance”
- finding record supported BZA’s determination that appellants failed to prove unnecessary hardship because they “presented no evidence that the property could not continue to be used profitably as a two- family dwelling as permitted by the zoning ordinance”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.