Skip to main content
· 11/19/1975

Board of Zoning App. of City of Whiting v. McFadden

Citations

  • 337 N.E.2d 576
  • 166 Ind. App. 534
  • 1975 Ind. App. LEXIS 1386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no unnecessary hardship where appellant “presented no evidence that the property could not continue to be used profitably as a two-family dwelling as permitted by the zoning ordinance”
  • finding record supported BZA’s determination that appellants failed to prove unnecessary hardship because they “presented no evidence that the property could not continue to be used profitably as a two- family dwelling as permitted by the zoning ordinance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.