Skip to main content
· 1/4/1985

Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund v. Hill

Citations

  • 472 N.E.2d 204
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding six percent salary contribution and eight to twenty-two years of service satisfied legal requirement of consideration
  • applying the rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
  • applying the Rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
  • applying the rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
  • applying the rule of necessity in a case involving calculation of judicial retirement benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Givan, Hunter, Prentice, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.