· 1/4/1985
Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement Fund v. Hill
Citations
- 472 N.E.2d 204
- 1985 Ind. LEXIS 724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding six percent salary contribution and eight to twenty-two years of service satisfied legal requirement of consideration
- applying the rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
- applying the Rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
- applying the rule to consider a challenge to a statutory amendment affecting judicial retirement benefits
- applying the rule of necessity in a case involving calculation of judicial retirement benefits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Debruler, Givan, Hunter, Prentice, Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.