Board of Trustees of Pension Fund v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that unlike in N.A.A.C.P. v. Husted, the record showed that SDR’s proximity to Election Day did not provide BOEs a sufficient number of days to verify SDR voters
• explaining “[i]t is far from clear that the Twenty-Sixth Amendment” is “effectively the Fifteenth Amendment but with young voters as the relevant class”
• “[North Carolina’s voter ID law] is also less burdensome than the Texas ID requirement . . . .”
• “inconsistency in the way colleges issued IDs” provided a “plausible” reason for declining to permit student IDs to be used for voting
• Section 2 challenges to: voter ID; early voting reductions; elimination of same-day voter registration and voting; elimination of counting ballots cast in the wrong precinct; and pre-registration for those under age 18
• Section 2 challenges to: voter ID; early voting reductions; elimination of same-day voter registration and voting; elimination of counting ballots cast in the wrong precinct; and pre-registration for those under age 18

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).