Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. McDearmott Commission Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing the standard as requiring the moving party to show “that it was impossible to complete the discovery by the established deadline.”
• denying the plaintiff’s request to extend discovery where the requesting party failed to establish that despite due diligence, discovery could not be timely completed
• characterizing the standard as requiring the moving party to show “that it was impossible to cIoImI. pAlnetael ythsies d iscovery by the established deadline.”
• stating that a pretrial scheduling order may be modified only for “good cause,” which “turns on the diligence of the moving party” and requires the party to explain “why it could not have completed the necessary discovery within the time frame established”
• A party moving to reopen discovery must show “that it was impossible to complete the discovery by the established deadline.”
• A party moving to reopen discovery must show “that it was impossible to complete the discovery by the established deadline.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).