Board of Supervisors v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the pre-2009 “employment discrimination provisions of chapter 216 ... require a showing of intent to discriminate”
• acknowledging that pay disparities could be evidence of gender-based discrimination for purposes of proving a claim under the ICRA
• stating that the pre-2009 “employment 11 discrimination provisions of chapter 216 . . . require a showing of intent to discriminate”
• acknowledging 17 that pay disparities could be evidence of gender-based discrimination for purposes of proving a claim under the ICRA
• “In deciding gender discrimination disputes, we adhere to the Title VII analytical framework. ...”
• “In deciding gender discrimination disputes, we adhere to the Title VII analytical framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824-25, 36 L.Ed.2d 668, 677-79 (1973

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).