Board of School Directors v. Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Gaskin’s proposed 11 conjoint analysis adequately accounts for supply-side factors and does not merely 12 measure demand-side, willingness-to-pay damages
• holding that proposed conjoint analysis that had not yet been executed was 27 sufficient to show that damages can be calculated on a class-wide basis with common proof
• holding that courts routinely 7 find that a proposed conjoint analysis adequately accounts for supply-side factors where it utilizes 8 actual sales data, including actual prices and quantities of past sales
• holding a “focalism 23 bias objection goes to the weight, and not to the admissibility” of a proffered survey
• holding a “focalism bias objection 16 goes to the weight, and not to the admissibility” of a proffered survey
• finding that 23 any failure to account for repeat buyers would likely have the effect of overestimating the 24 market price premia, which does not render the survey excludable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).