Board of Regents v. Oglesby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the negligence cause of action was barred because it accrued long before passage of the statutory waiver of sovereign immunity
• explaining that “a defendant can raise a plea in abatement ... that raises the issue of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the trial court” (citing Ga.Code Ann. § 9—11—12(b)(1) (1993)) (emphasis added)
• explaining that \a defendant can raise a plea in abatement ... that raises the issue of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the trial court\ (citing Ga.Code Ann. § 9-11-12(b)(1) (1993)) (emphasis added)
• “[Plaintiffs] claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, of course, is subject to O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33.”
• when trial court makes determinations of fact when ruling on motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, “[i]ts evaluation rests on where the preponderance of evidence lies, not necessarily on whether the issue may be decided as a matter of law.”
• when trial court makes determinations of fact when ruling on motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, “[i]ts evaluation rests on where the preponderance of evidence lies, not necessarily on whether the issue may be decided as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).