Board of Regents v. Canas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order that denies a motion to dismiss, based on a conclusive determination that the state is not immune from suit on the basis of sovereign immunity, is directly appealable
• holding that an order, which denied a motion to dismiss based on a conclusive determination that sovereign immunity did not bar suit, was directly appealable because the interlocutory order met the criteria of the collateral order doctrine
• holding “that an order that denies a motion to dismiss, based on a conclusive determination that the State (or a state officer or employee
• holding “that an order that denies a motion to dismiss, based on a conclusive determination that the State (or a state officer or employee
• order denying motion to dismiss a certain claim is not a directly appealable final judgment
• order denying motion to dismiss a certain claim is not a directly appealable final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).